Jane Gillett
2014-03-24 11:38:29 UTC
First of all "DEFRA" - Department of FOOD and Rural Affairs; relevant to a
FOOD and Drink group. OK?
I refer to a DEFRA document called "Identifying and recording sheep and
goats" which has just arrived by post accompanied by a letter which states
that an electronic system of reporting animal movement will be introduced
from April 2014.
OK.
My moan is the following paragraph in the letter:
"Please note that in line with the Government's digital strategy this is
the last time that a paper copy of this guidance is being distributed.
Future changes will only be made to the online version.".
A url is given.
Why does this annoy me?
The document in question is a 16 page (+ fancy illustrated cover) brochure.
It will probably appear as a pdf or have that as an alternative.
Either way it will be big and take a long time to download.
In common with many other rural areas - <where the majority of sheep are
farmed, surprise, surprise> - we have a very small internet bandwidth which
means that big documents take a long time to download so it's not a good
route for most farmers to receive big communications; government ones are
the ones I am complaining about.
Why am I singling out "government"?
Government has plans for rolling out "Faster Internet for ALL" or some such
title. Only problem is tha our area is apparently not on the list for the
planned rollout; seemingly too small. We MAY be considered when/if the
situation is reassessed AFTER the present exercise is completed but in the
interim we cannot expect any improvement. In addition, IAGTU there are
areas which do not even have access to broadband.
Now, we have chosen to live in a rural area (most farmers generally do) and
if you live in such an area it is reasonable to assume that some of the
advantages of modern life may not reach you for instance we have no public
transport. We don't complain about that (well, not often) just live with
it, and if we have problems with certain private communications that's our
decision, but I do expect a <government> department which knowingly deals
particularly with rural areas not to expect to be able to use all the
facilities which would be available in non-rural areas. So why is DEFRA
choosing methods which rely on fast internet? May I suggest that either
they are not aware of the internet restrictions of farming areas (ie don't
know their job) or just don't care; not their problem.
Muttering
Jane
FOOD and Drink group. OK?
I refer to a DEFRA document called "Identifying and recording sheep and
goats" which has just arrived by post accompanied by a letter which states
that an electronic system of reporting animal movement will be introduced
from April 2014.
OK.
My moan is the following paragraph in the letter:
"Please note that in line with the Government's digital strategy this is
the last time that a paper copy of this guidance is being distributed.
Future changes will only be made to the online version.".
A url is given.
Why does this annoy me?
The document in question is a 16 page (+ fancy illustrated cover) brochure.
It will probably appear as a pdf or have that as an alternative.
Either way it will be big and take a long time to download.
In common with many other rural areas - <where the majority of sheep are
farmed, surprise, surprise> - we have a very small internet bandwidth which
means that big documents take a long time to download so it's not a good
route for most farmers to receive big communications; government ones are
the ones I am complaining about.
Why am I singling out "government"?
Government has plans for rolling out "Faster Internet for ALL" or some such
title. Only problem is tha our area is apparently not on the list for the
planned rollout; seemingly too small. We MAY be considered when/if the
situation is reassessed AFTER the present exercise is completed but in the
interim we cannot expect any improvement. In addition, IAGTU there are
areas which do not even have access to broadband.
Now, we have chosen to live in a rural area (most farmers generally do) and
if you live in such an area it is reasonable to assume that some of the
advantages of modern life may not reach you for instance we have no public
transport. We don't complain about that (well, not often) just live with
it, and if we have problems with certain private communications that's our
decision, but I do expect a <government> department which knowingly deals
particularly with rural areas not to expect to be able to use all the
facilities which would be available in non-rural areas. So why is DEFRA
choosing methods which rely on fast internet? May I suggest that either
they are not aware of the internet restrictions of farming areas (ie don't
know their job) or just don't care; not their problem.
Muttering
Jane
--
Jane Gillett : ***@higherstert.co.uk : Totnes, Devon.
Jane Gillett : ***@higherstert.co.uk : Totnes, Devon.